Compare / trousers
FootJoy PAR Trousers vs J.Lindeberg Mitch Light Poly Trousers
FootJoy PAR Trousers is currently the cheaper option, £67.53 less (£31.47 vs £99). Prices, price history, and retailer availability tracked across UK golf retailers and updated daily.
Where to buy · 8 retailers
Where to buy · 1 retailer
The verdict
On price alone the FootJoy PAR Trousers is the pick: £67.53 cheaper at £31.47, versus £99 for the J.Lindeberg Mitch Light Poly Trousers. The FootJoy PAR Trousers is the more widely available, at 8 UK retailers versus 1.
Is now a good time to buy?
FootJoy PAR Trousers
Good time to buy
J.Lindeberg Mitch Light Poly Trousers
Not enough price history yet.
Price history
How each has moved since we started trackingLowest tracked price per day, any condition. Caddence tracks both daily.
FootJoy PAR Trousers
Seen 9 April 2026
Typical over 23 days
Most expensive seen
Tracked high − low
J.Lindeberg Mitch Light Poly Trousers
At it right now
Typical over 69 days
Most expensive seen
Tracked high − low
Waiting for a better price?
Set a free alert and we’ll email you when either drops to your target.
More trousers comparisons
- FootJoy PAR Trousers vs Adidas Ultimate365 Tapered Trousers Compare →
- FootJoy PAR Trousers vs Under Armour Drive Tapered Trousers Compare →
- FootJoy PAR Trousers vs Ping Sherwell Throuser Trousers Compare →
- J.Lindeberg Mitch Light Poly Trousers vs Adidas Ultimate365 Tapered Trousers Compare →
- J.Lindeberg Mitch Light Poly Trousers vs Under Armour Drive Tapered Trousers Compare →
- J.Lindeberg Mitch Light Poly Trousers vs Ping Sherwell Throuser Trousers Compare →
Common questions about the FootJoy PAR Trousers vs J.Lindeberg Mitch Light Poly Trousers
Prices shown are the cheapest in-stock price per retailer tracked by Caddence, updated daily. Always confirm the final price on the retailer's site.