Compare / shorts
FootJoy PAR Shorts vs Lyle & Scott Course Stretch Chino Shorts
FootJoy PAR Shorts is currently the cheaper option, £38.02 less (£26.97 vs £64.99). Prices, price history, and retailer availability tracked across UK golf retailers and updated daily.
Where to buy · 10 retailers
Where to buy · 1 retailer
The verdict
On price alone the FootJoy PAR Shorts is the pick: £38.02 cheaper at £26.97, versus £64.99 for the Lyle & Scott Course Stretch Chino Shorts. The FootJoy PAR Shorts is the more widely available, at 10 UK retailers versus 1.
Is now a good time to buy?
FootJoy PAR Shorts
Good time to buy
Lyle & Scott Course Stretch Chino Shorts
Around its usual price
Price history
How each has moved since we started trackingLowest tracked price per day, any condition. Caddence tracks both daily.
FootJoy PAR Shorts
Seen 20 April 2026
Typical over 16 days
Most expensive seen
Tracked high − low
Lyle & Scott Course Stretch Chino Shorts
Seen 13 April 2026
Typical over 69 days
Most expensive seen
Tracked high − low
Waiting for a better price?
Set a free alert and we’ll email you when either drops to your target.
More shorts comparisons
- FootJoy PAR Shorts vs Under Armour Drive Tapered Shorts Compare →
- FootJoy PAR Shorts vs Adidas Ultimate 365 Shorts Compare →
- FootJoy PAR Shorts vs Ping Bradley II Shorts Compare →
- Lyle & Scott Course Stretch Chino Shorts vs Under Armour Drive Tapered Shorts Compare →
- Lyle & Scott Course Stretch Chino Shorts vs Adidas Ultimate 365 Shorts Compare →
- Lyle & Scott Course Stretch Chino Shorts vs Ping Bradley II Shorts Compare →
Common questions about the FootJoy PAR Shorts vs Lyle & Scott Course Stretch Chino Shorts
Prices shown are the cheapest in-stock price per retailer tracked by Caddence, updated daily. Always confirm the final price on the retailer's site.