Compare / jacket
FootJoy Hydrolite X Jacket vs Puma Ripguard Tour Jacket
Puma Ripguard Tour Jacket is currently the cheaper option, £36.03 less (£52.97 vs £89). Prices, price history, and retailer availability tracked across UK golf retailers and updated daily.
Where to buy · 10 retailers
Where to buy · 1 retailer
The verdict
On price alone the Puma Ripguard Tour Jacket is the pick: £36.03 cheaper at £52.97, versus £89 for the FootJoy Hydrolite X Jacket. But measured against its own history the FootJoy Hydrolite X Jacket is the stronger deal right now: it's at the lowest price we’ve tracked, while the Puma Ripguard Tour Jacket is at its lowest tracked price. The FootJoy Hydrolite X Jacket is the more widely available, at 10 UK retailers versus 1.
Is now a good time to buy?
FootJoy Hydrolite X Jacket
Lowest price we’ve seen
Puma Ripguard Tour Jacket
Not enough price history yet.
Price history
How each has moved since we started trackingLowest tracked price per day, any condition. Caddence tracks both daily.
FootJoy Hydrolite X Jacket
At it right now
Typical over 17 days
Most expensive seen
Tracked high − low
Puma Ripguard Tour Jacket
At it right now
Typical over 71 days
Most expensive seen
Tracked high − low
Waiting for a better price?
Set a free alert and we’ll email you when either drops to your target.
More jacket comparisons
- FootJoy Hydrolite X Jacket vs FootJoy Hydrotour Rain Jacket Compare →
- FootJoy Hydrolite X Jacket vs Ping Aquadrive Waterproof Golf Jacket P03757 Compare →
- FootJoy Hydrolite X Jacket vs FootJoy HydroLite Rain Jackets Compare →
- Puma Ripguard Tour Jacket vs FootJoy Hydrotour Rain Jacket Compare →
- Puma Ripguard Tour Jacket vs Ping Aquadrive Waterproof Golf Jacket P03757 Compare →
- Puma Ripguard Tour Jacket vs FootJoy HydroLite Rain Jackets Compare →
Common questions about the FootJoy Hydrolite X Jacket vs Puma Ripguard Tour Jacket
Prices shown are the cheapest in-stock price per retailer tracked by Caddence, updated daily. Always confirm the final price on the retailer's site.