Compare / shorts
Calvin Performance 2.0 Shorts vs FootJoy Performance MT Lite Slim FIT Shorts
Calvin Performance 2.0 Shorts is currently the cheaper option, £2.96 less (£34.99 vs £37.95). Prices, price history, and retailer availability tracked across UK golf retailers and updated daily.
The verdict
On price alone the Calvin Performance 2.0 Shorts is the pick: £2.96 cheaper at £34.99, versus £37.95 for the FootJoy Performance MT Lite Slim FIT Shorts. The FootJoy Performance MT Lite Slim FIT Shorts is the more widely available, at 1 UK retailers versus 0.
Is now a good time to buy?
Calvin Performance 2.0 Shorts
Lowest price we’ve seen
FootJoy Performance MT Lite Slim FIT Shorts
Not enough price history yet.
Price history
How each has moved since we started trackingLowest tracked price per day, any condition. Caddence tracks both daily.
Calvin Performance 2.0 Shorts
At it right now
Typical over 4 days
Most expensive seen
Tracked high − low
FootJoy Performance MT Lite Slim FIT Shorts
At it right now
Typical over 77 days
Most expensive seen
Tracked high − low
Waiting for a better price?
Set a free alert and we’ll email you when either drops to your target.
More shorts comparisons
- Calvin Performance 2.0 Shorts vs FootJoy PAR Shorts Compare →
- Calvin Performance 2.0 Shorts vs Under Armour Drive Tapered Shorts Compare →
- Calvin Performance 2.0 Shorts vs Galvin Green Percy Shorts Compare →
- FootJoy Performance MT Lite Slim FIT Shorts vs FootJoy PAR Shorts Compare →
- FootJoy Performance MT Lite Slim FIT Shorts vs Under Armour Drive Tapered Shorts Compare →
- FootJoy Performance MT Lite Slim FIT Shorts vs Galvin Green Percy Shorts Compare →
Common questions about the Calvin Performance 2.0 Shorts vs FootJoy Performance MT Lite Slim FIT Shorts
Prices shown are the cheapest in-stock price per retailer tracked by Caddence, updated daily. Always confirm the final price on the retailer's site.